Top 7 best horror stories in Literature

This month our top 7 list is about famous tales in literature that will send chills up and down your spine! Get ready to get goosebumps all over as you read 7 of the most famous short stories ever written in the history of Literature:

1)      The Black Cat by Edgar Allan Poe

The first place in our list goes to the master of horror Edgar Allan Poe! In this story we can see how one person can gradually go from being a nice and caring husband to a murderer! 

2)      The Monkey’s Paw  by W. W. Jacobs

A good story about lucky charms and about how careful we need to be with what we wish for! In this story, a man is given a fetish (a lucky charm) which grants him 3 wishes. Little did he know that his wishes would bring upon him consequences that would make him rue the day he was born. 

3)      The Legend of the Sleepy Hollow by Washington Irving

This classic has been made into so many movies and cartoons throughout the centuries that I'm pretty sure anyone might have heard about  this story.

4)      The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gillman

One of my personal favorites! Many may argue that this is not a horror story and that it should not have been included in this list, but I still think that one of the possible readings we can get from this story is under a paranormal stance. A must-read!

5)      The Bottle Imp by Robert Lois Stevenson

6)      The Horla by Guy de Maupassant  (both versions are nice)

This story is about a being that torments a poor soul in France. The story has been written twice, one of the versions is a 1^st account of some paranormal accidents that were written in the format of a diary whereas the second version of the story is a 3^rd person-narrated short story. Both versions are nice as they give you different insights on the story.

7)   Young Goodman Brown by Nathaniel Hawthorne

   

A classic story I had to read in college and that I will remember for the rest of my life. This one is about a meeting in the woods with the “dark one” and his “followers”. If you are into horror stories, you must read this one!

Some further recommendations:

8)      The tumb by H. P. Lovecraft

9)      The mask of the red death by Edgar Allan Poe ( and all of Poe’s stories lol)

10)   Noite na Taverna (this is not a short story, but it is one of the best horror stories ever written in human kind! Lol )

Frankenweenie: uma história de superação ou de escapismo?

Primeiramente eu gostaria de explicar a minha ausência nesse blog ( não que alguém a tenha percebido). Eu tenho andado um pouco sem inspiração para escrever nesses últimos meses. Parte desse desânimo deve ser por causa do meu  cansaço, já que escrevi a minha TCC, terminei algumas matérias da faculdade, li uns 5 livros, tudo isso só nesse ano. Enfim, não anda fácil pra ninguém, e eu não sou exceção. Contudo, eu assisti um filme hoje a tarde que me "perturbou" um pouco e por isso voltei ao blog para expor os meus sentimentos em relação ao desenho.. 

Alguém aqui já assistiu o novo filme do Tim Burton chamado Frankenweenie? Então, para quem ainda não chegou a assistir o filme, a história é a seguinte: um menino chamado Victor perde o seu cãozinho. Não aceitando a morte do seu bichinho de estimação, Victor decidi reviver Sparky, inspirando-se nas aulas de ciências . Ao saber que Sparky voltou a vida, um dos colegas de Victor espalha que o garoto conseguiu ressuscitar o seu animalzinho e o fato desperta inveja nos outros colegas de sala, já que todos estavam competindo pelo melhor projeto na feira de ciências. Motivados pela inveja, os colegas de sala de Victor descobrem como trazer os mortos a vida e começam a ressuscitar seus animais de estimação para poderem competir na feira de ciência em pé de igualdade. A história acaba com os animais mortos sendo mortos de novo, já que ao voltarem para esse plano, os animais se tornaram malvados, e com Sparky  doando a própria "vida" para salvar a vida do seu dono, Victor.  No final do filme Sparky morre, mas é trazido de volta ao mundo dos vivos e o filme acaba assim. 

Agora vamos aos fatos que me deixaram meio pensativo após ver esse desenho.A maioria das pessoas já presenciaram a morte de alguém querido. Um amigo, um parente, um animalzinho, o que seja. Será que não seria mais saudável fazer uma história na qual o personagem principal aceitasse a perca do seu cachorrinho ao invés de ficar tentando revive-lo várias vezes? Podem me chamar de radical, ou de querer ver coisas onde não tem, só que não seria melhor mostrar a morte como algo que não há como ser vencida e que o que temos que fazer é entender o que aconteceu, aceitar o ocorrido e seguir em frente? 

Bruno Bettleheim escreveu um ótimo livro chamado A psicanálise dos contos de fadas em que ele dá uma interpretação para alguns contos de fadas famosos e disserta sobre a importância das histórias infantis para que a criança possa se tornar um adulto saudável. Se me lembro bem, porque faz 4 anos que eu li esse livro pela última vez, ele também fala sobre o processo de identificação que a criança faz com os personagens das historinhas infantis com as quais ela tem contato. Através dessas histórias as crianças se identificam com os vilões, como os mocinhos, aprendem o que é ser malvado e o que é ser bom, aprendem os "gender roles" (papeis de gênero) da sociedade na qual estão inseridas, e etc. Depois de ver esse filme, fiquei pensando se esse processo não ocorre também com desenhos animados. Será que Frankenweenie não está apresentando uma visão muito alegre sobre a morte e deixando de lado o aspecto inevitável e irremediável da morte somente para que as crianças tenham um final feliz? Não seria um final feliz o entendimento de Victor de que Sparky morreu e que ele deve seguir em frente sempre guardando no coração o amigo perdido?

De fato, eu não sei responder as perguntas que eu levantei aqui, mas achei que seria interessante  dividi-las com alguns amigos e de registrar nesse blog um questionamento que eu considero válido. Espero continuar com meus posts, alguns em português e outros em inglês. So stay tuned for more! 

1st post of the year

So I'm back and as my first post of the year, I'd like to announce that I spent every day of my last couple of weeks in 2012 watching Asian series, animes and movies and that I am willing to share my experience to all those who want to watch some nice Asian stuff. Twice a week I will be posting a simple, spoiler-free, movie review in which I will write my impressions on the movie and also will try to describe the plot without giving off any piece of information that may spoil your fun. So stay tuned for more.

Merry Xmas and a Happy New Year!

Well, 2012 is almost over and  all I can say is that I do hope you have had a great year! In case you haven't had the best year of your life, DO NOT KILL YOURSELF! (lol) Let us all hope that 2013 will be a far better year, full of opportunities and lots of fun! I'm pretty sure we will have lots of opportunities in 2013, so all we have to do is to "seize the days" to follow! May our 2013 be spent amongst our friends and kin, our health be better,  our salary increase, and last but not least , may we have lots of fun in order to make 2013 a most memorable year! 

Keep on visiting my blog and thank you so much all of you who have been  reading and contributing my posts.  

Feliz Natal e um próspero ano novo para todos! 

Danilo Neves

Why so intolerant?

There are three things in the world that get on nerves so bad that I have to count to 1000 just to keep myself under my own grip. Those are: people trying to convert me using the argument: “my religion is the correct path to heavens”, people who are too lazy to study anything, and those who do not agree with gay marriage. I live in Brazil and as every nice citizen should feel, I felt extremely proud of my country when on May 05th the legal union for homosexual couples was allowed. What I heard from people, however, is that such a thing should have never been allowed, and such a thing was an “abomination” to “God”. Then, full with indignation, I decided to write a post on this controversial theme showing some of the reasons why every person who considers himself or herself a RATIONAL being should agree with gay marriage despite of his or her religious background. First, marriage itself is not religious but a social institution. Christianity has indeed preached for years that only men and women have the right to wed, but what most people forget is that there are many other groups out there that are not Christian and they want to have the same rights as anybody else! And for all those who think that marriage among homosexuals should not be allowed based on the “fact” that the bible condemns it , I’m sorry but I have some news for you: our country is not under a theocratic regimen, but under a democracy. And to all those religious simpletons who were raised in a church and think they know the bible just because they have read it once: people are not obligated to live under the rules of a book they don’t even believe in! I wonder how they would like if a Buddhist told them that Christian couples can’t get married just because Buddha said so! (No offences to the Buddhists, I just used them to represent any religion other than any bible-oriented ones) Another “argument” that aggravates me is when people say: “I don’t agree with gay marriage because I wouldn’t like to see two men kissing in a public place”, or, “I don’t support gay marriage because I’m afraid of what will become of our children”. To all those who feel offended when they see two men or two girls kissing when they only want to show AFFECTION, you should simply stop staring at them and let them be happy! Why is it that people have to meddle with other people’s business? If you feel so bad when you see a gay couple kissing, imagine how much worse they feel when they want to say “ I love you” to the person they love and they simply CAN’T or when they see other (straight ) couples are kissing and they can’t do the same! Now here comes the question: why can straight people show affection and gay people can’t if they both pay the same amount of taxes and they both contribute to the development of our society just as much? All in all, what I’m trying to get across is: let other people be happy and do never try to impose your religious view on other people because I’m sure that you wouldn’t like if they did the same to you! I am not much a religious person myself, but I do reckon that the bible, as any other religious book, has many nice messages that are indeed worthy learning and following and one that I think is interesting is this one that is on Matthew 7: 12, it goes like this: “ (..) in everything, therefore, treat people the same way you want them to treat you, for this is the Law and the Prophets”. For those who might have problems understanding what is written here, I guess that this message applies in our context in the sense that we should not try to take away other people’s right to be and live their lives whichever way they want because we would not enjoy if they did the same to us.

Gender roles and sexism in Alice in Wonderland, Peter Pan, and Harry Potter

Gender roles in children’s books are things teachers and parents alike should think about when buying/assigning a book for a child to read. Are the books that our kids have been reading exempt from what we have long fought against? That is, are children’s books exempt from sexism, homophobia, misogyny and all others sources of prejudice? Peter Pan, Alice in Wonderland and Harry Potter are nice examples of children’s books that will probably be read forever and as such, we should reflect if they are fit for children to read, if they carry good examples for kids and also why children like these books so much. To start with, and taking for granted that most readers are familiar with the plot of these three stories, I would like to pose a question to my reader: how strong is sexism in these stories?

Considering the end of Peter Pan in which Peter remains in Neverland as a child-like “deity”, and contrasting it to the ending of Alice in Wonderland in which after lots of problems, Alice goes back home, we should ask: why it is that Peter Pan has the right to remain in Wonderland (his own dreamland) and live all sorts of adventures as the “master” of the island, whereas Alice needs to go through a large number of dangers and nuisances when she is also living in her own dreamland? Also, let’s consider Wendy in Peter Pan. She practically becomes a housewife in Neverland while her brothers, along with all the other lost boys, have their share of fun and excitement! It seems as though, women and men take on different roles in society even if they are living in a completely imaginary, parallel world. This idea that girls cannot have a powerful position in society, even if they are in a fictitious wonderful dreamland, is discussed further on in the books of the Harry Potter series. At the same time that there are very influential women characters in the series, such as Hermione and Professor Minerva, these women characters still haven’t any position as high as that of the other male characters, Harry Potter, Dumbledore and Voldemort. 

My personal thought on this issue is that, despite their beauty, both Wonderland and Neverland (and I daresay Hogwarts) are not places fit for little girls, which is nothing more than a reflection of the gender roles that have been ascribed to women since the Victorian period. Values which still linger in our 21st century society. Sexism exists and it can be found in all types of arts, reinforced by all kinds of gender roles, and if we don’t fight against them, they will never stop existing. I’m not trying to say here that the books I mentioned shouldn’t be read, but that their plot and characters should always be taken with a pitch of salt. To reflect about how women and men are portrayed in children’s book and to show children that they don’t have be to Wendys in real life is to foster critical discussions and to help children understand that they do not have to comply with gender norms, which in my opinion, is the goal of education! So let us teach Harry Potter, Alice, and Peter Pan, but always keeping in mind our role as critically thinking teachers.

Reference: "The boy who lived: From Carroll's Alice and Barrie's Peter Pan to Rowling's Harry Potter" by Billone, Amy Christine.

Top 7 k-pop bands

I believe most everyone has already heard or/and danced Psy’s major youtube hit “Gangnam style”( in case you haven't, don't waste time and watch it NOW: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bZkp7q19f0), however let us not forget that there is a lot more of Korean music where Psy came from! To those who, like me, enjoy listening to new stuff every now and then, I made a list of my 7 favorite Korean bands/ singers and their “best" songs. Make sure to check them below and let me know which is your favorite K-pop band/ song" 

Galera, todo mundo já ouviu o hit do Psy Gangnam style, né? (Se você ainda não viu, assista AGORA por que super vale a pena conferir: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bZkp7q19f0). Além do Psy, várias outras bandas coreanas também tem bombado na internet e por isso eu fiz esse post com as minhas 7 bandas de K-pop favoritas! O que vocês acharam? 

7- Wonder Girls- Be my baby (English version)

6- SISTAR- So cool

5- A1B4- Baby Goodnight

4- HyunA (4 minute) - Bubble Pop

3- Super Junior- Sorry, Sorry

2- 2NE1- I'm the best

1- SNSD (Girl’s Generation) -The Boys (English version) / Gee  (I'm sorry guys, SNSD is my favorite band, so I can't just pick one song! I had to pick at least the two ones I LOVE the most!!) 

So guys, what did you think of my ranking? Do you have any suggestions?

Então galera, alguma sugestão de alguma banda/ música que deveria entrar para o Top 7?
PS: These is MY top 7, so don't criticise me!

Aegyo in South Korea

If you watch any Korean dorama (a dorama is a type of soap opera that is very common in the Asian world) or go through some video clips by some famous Korean bands and singers (to name a few examples: Girl’s Generation, B1A4, SISTAR, and Hyuna) you’ll find it impossible to not notice how girls and boys talk and act and how different it is from our western world. At first sight what you will notice is that most girls and women are constantly trying to look childlike and cute and you might even think that they have a mental problem or that they are stuck in their early teens. A friend of mine once even suggested that Korean girls acted “cute” to draw the attention of older men who might find it arousing to fantasize about younger girls.  However, by having a second look at the same video clips and doramas, it should be clear that being “cute” in Korea, or as they say, aegyo, is far more than an isolated incident; in fact, it is a cultural practice that very often takes place in Korea.

Aegyo (Hangeul: 애교) is a Korean adjective that translates into English as “winsome”, which according to the Cambridge dictionary means: “(adj) attractive and pleasing, with simple qualities, sometimes like those a child has”. To put it simply, aegyo is looking cute in a very childlike fashion. However, in terms of society, there is much more than meets the eyes and being aegyo in South Korea takes a whole new dimension.  It is present in music, in their doramas, in people’s everyday life and it has affected Korean society from the way people make music to the types of plastic surgeries that are performed.

First and foremost, we have to consider that aegyo is typically South Korean and that it is usually associated to young females, though some boys are also very fond of looking aegyo, too.  According to the vlog eat your kimchi , women tend to try to look aegyo since they are very young until they are in their mid-thirties,  after that, they no longer try to sound and look cute unless they are making fun of something.  Thus, this practice seems to be related age and also to gender.  

To look aegyo is an activity that involves the whole body as well as the voice. Girls can close their eyes, pout their mouths, and pinch their cheeks, twirl their hair in order to look cute. Boys often make finger horns, duck faces, and finger hearts. To top it off, they can lengthen the duration of the vowels and slightly raise the pitch of their voices to sound childish and needy. The aim of doing all of the aforementioned changes is to captivate people’s attention by looking so cute that people are likely to get a cuteness overload by just having a glance at you.

As mentioned before, this practice nowadays is widely spread , not only on TV but also in real life. As matter of fact, people have gotten so interested in looking younger that there is even a surgery called “aegyo sal surgery” which aims at filling the lower part of your eyes so that they look bigger, therefore, making you look younger and more “aegyo-ish”. This procedure is purely aesthetic and has been criticized for many people do not understand the difference between aegyo sals and eye bags. The difference however is that whereas aegyo sal contributes to your looking good and juvenile, eye bags are saggy and darked, and most often makes you look tired. Not to mention that the only way one can get aegyo sals is by surgery while anyone can get eye bags by not sleeping properly.

In a nutshell, “aegyo” is an important aspect of Korean culture and it needs to be thought of in the light of the fact that Asian culture is somewhat different from our western culture. People need to stop looking at other people’s culture having their mother culture’s perspective. Before judging Korean girls and boys as silly and childish, one needs to understand that beauty standards differ from country to country as well as from time to time. What is considered cute in one culture may be seen as stupid or extremely unattractive in another culture’s perspective.  This said, it is important to understand what “aegyo” is if one wants to attempt to understand how Koreans see beauty and to construe all the underlying meanings of what being cute is for the majority of Korean people.

References:

http://tokyofashiongirls.blogspot.com.br/2012/08/aegyo.html

http://www.wikihow.com/Act-Like-Sunny-from-Girls-Generation

http://rainbow7.wikia.com/wiki/Aegyo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKadTlr-He8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bQJ0b7lSoXU

Resposta ao texto: MPF em SP pede retirada da frase 'Deus seja louvado' das notas de reais

Em primeiro lugar é preciso entender que o Estado Laico existe numa forma de criar igualdade. O motivo pelo qual é preciso tirar a frase "Deus seja louvado” é exatamente uma tentativa de tirar o foco de 1 grupo de religiões para tornar o Estado mais justo. Se fossemos envolver religião nas notas, então que sejam de todas  e não só uma especificamente. Teríamos que ter notas com “Budah seja louvado” com “Zeus seja louvado” com “Iemanjá seja louvado” e etc. A ideia é não priorizar ninguém. Só o fato de ter APENAS o “Deus seja louvado” nas notas é uma re-afirmação de um estado totalmente cristão, que, aliás, é uma ideia errônea por que temos MUITOS brasileiros que não são cristãos e que, portanto, não são representados de qualquer maneira. A maioria das pessoas podem até ser cristãs, mas e as minorias? Elas também não têm que serem representadas? Ora, se elas não são então vivemos num país desigual, e até aonde eu sei, desigualdade é exatamente o que  temos que evitar num estado humanizado e para todos. Os cristãos têm que ter voz no Estado, mas eles não podem ser os únicos a ter essa voz. O governo Brasileiro nesse quesito representa o Brasil, sim. Só que ele representa um Brasil que não é só cristão, mas plural quando se fala de religião.

Aqui está o link http://g1.globo.com/economia/noticia/2012/11/mpf-em-sp-pede-retirada-da-frase-deus-seja-louvado-das-notas-de-reais.html

Confessions...

One thing that has bothered me quite much lately is the fact that lots of Brazilian people get utterly offended when they hear that foreigners have next to no idea where Brazil is, or which city is our capital, or which language we speak. On the one hand, it’s true that Brazil is a big country and is a big influence in today’s world; therefore, people should know a thing or two about us. But on the other hand, there are HUNDREDS of countries all over the globe! Knowing everything about all these countries is impossible!

I have a question for you:  do you have any idea what language they speak in Congo, in Malaysia, in Kuwait, or in Latvia? Better yet, do you know the name of the capital of Iraq, New Zealand, or Serbia?  I bet you don’t. That is to show you that foreigners are under no obligation to know what language we speak here or what the capital of our country is! Think about it: there are lots of countries in the world; do we have to know everything about those countries? I don’t think so.

Then again, I don’t mean to say that foreigners shouldn’t care about learning about Brazil, but I do think we should stop criticizing Americans, Canadians, Argentineans and everyone else who doesn’t know much about Brazil. Instead of judging them and putting a “dunce hat” on their heads, we should be more kind and teach them a thing or two about our country! Trust me, there is a lot we need to share about us and criticizing people is not the way to sharing our rich and unique Brazilian culture.

ps:

What do you know about Brazil? ( This is exactly the type of video I hate to watch, because not only does it expose the people who were in the video, but it just restates the stereotype that nobody knows anything about Brazil- which is, as I put it before, just a mere sterotype)

Maneki Neko: a bit of Japanese culture

"Maneki Neko” is a very common artifact in the Japanese culture and roughly translates into “beckoning cat” or “welcoming cat” because of its lifted paw which is said to be welcoming people. Maneki Nekos are believed to be lucky charms and are usually placed in front of stores and inside houses all across Japan as a means to attract customers and friends.  Apart from being a lucky charm that brings love, money, and peace depending on its color and which paw is being raised, Maneki Nekos are very typical cultural artifacts from Japan and this is the reason why we chose to analyze and study them.

The history of Maneki Neko dates back from the Edo Period (1693- 1867), however, the information found from this period is scarce, which suggests that maneki nekos were not as common then as they are nowadays. Nevetheless, From the Meiji Period (1868- 1912) onwards, maneki neko becomes a very common lucky charm and registers are already plentiful, differently from the Edo Period. A possible explanation for this growth of Maneki Nekos in Japanese culture relies on the fact that in Japan during the Edo Period, brothels used to have a shelf on which the owners of the establishment would keep a large amount of lucky charms shaped as penises.  Keeping that in mind, it was quite hard for the Japanese people not to shock westerners when they visited Japan. So as a means to make Japan a more “decent” country in the light of the Western Christianism, the owners of brothels decided to change the lucky charms that were molded as penises to those of cats, since cats symbolize woman in the Japanese imagery.

On top of that, there are many myths and legends on the origin on Maneki Neko. One of the most famous legends has it that in a village there was a geisha who had a small cat whom she loved very much. One day, however, her cat started to tug at her apparently without any reason. Seeing this, a brave swordsman thought that the cat was attacking the geisha and as soon as he could, he chopped off the head of the cat, which flew to the ceiling, killing a poisonous snake that was about to strike. Needless to say, killing the cat made the geisha very sad; this touched the swordsman very deeply to the point that he asked a very skilled craftsman to carve a likeness of the murdered cat, thus making the geisha happy again.

The second story is about a noble man who was coming back from a hunt and was caught on in a very violent storm. In the midst of the downpour, the man saw a cat beckoning to him as if it were calling him. Following the cat, the man was startled by the fact that as soon as he got away from where he was, a lightening hit a tree which fell down just where he was. The cat had saved his life as a token of his appreciation he started to make carved copies of the magical cat as an homage.

In conclusion, Maneki Nekos are very cute little catlike charms which are said to have the power to bring luck, money and heath depending on their color and on which paw it is raising. They are ancient cultural artifacts and reflect a very nice aspect (perspective) of Japanese culture: their supersticiousness. So, if you ever happen to visit Japan, make sure to buy yourself some maneki nekos, you never know when you may need some extra luck.

 ps: The Pokemon Meowth is based on the Maneki Neko! 

DISCUSSÃO: Somos conscientizadores ou professores?

Eu sou professor de inglês e em uma discussão com um colega estávamos pensando sobre a nossa função como professores e sobre o fato de que muitos professores de língua levam em consideração somente a proficiência lingüística que o aluno consegue produzir em suas avaliações.  Essa discussão motivou esse poste e eu gostaria de expor a minha opinião e saber a opinião de meus amigos professores e também de alunos sobre essa questão.

Primeiramente vale lembrar que perante tantos problemas sociais, há uma pergunta. Os professores conseguem ensinar o conteúdo que eles tentam passar?  Se sim, a educação se resume somente ao um conjunto de conhecimento que um aluno deve entender? E as ideologias que são perpetuadas no seu discurso enquanto docente em sala de aula? E as práticas sociais que são reafirmadas dentro da sala de aula? O professor deve problematizar essas práticas ou somente ignorá-las e passar o conteúdo proposto pelo PCN ou pelo currículo da escola?  

No meu contexto, como professor de línguas em um centro de línguas de uma universidade federal, o objetivo é ensinar língua e desenvolver as habilidades receptivas (ouvir e ler) e produtivas (falar e escrever) dos alunos. Contudo, o que é língua e para que/quem serve essa língua?  A língua inglesa seria somente um conjunto dos sistemas gramaticais e de vocabulário?  O professor tem que se importar mais com que o aluno diz ou com as estruturas gramaticais com as quais ele diz o que diz?

Será possível ensinar só língua? Será que ao ignorarmos questões de sexo, raça, gênero, e igualdade na sala de aula não estamos na verdade é reafirmando que essas questões não existem, assim contribuindo para a sociedade machista, racista, e homofóbica na qual nós vivemos?  Será que ensinar focando somente na língua inglesa não é uma maneira de negar o papel transformador da educação? Mais importante ainda é questionar: o ensino de línguas em cursos de idiomas é ou não é parte da educação? Pessoalmente, eu acredito que sim e queria finalizar esse poste com uma pergunta que eu fiz há muito tempo atrás enquanto eu estudava alguns teóricos do ensino crítico em minha aula de língua: O que adianta os alunos saírem das nossas salas de aula como indivíduos proficientes na língua alvo, mas se eles não têm nada interessante para dizer? 

Have you ever gotten tired of yourself?

            Have you ever gotten tired of your looks, your favorite songs and even your favorite friends? Have you already gotten to that stage in your life when everything which once seemed to be so much fun seems to you utterly uninteresting and you can’t help but feel bored whenever you’re alone?

            I believe I’m in this stage of my life as you read this post. Most college classes don’t cheer me up any longer, many books don’t seem to interest  me much, music is okay but it’s nothing  that really touches me or makes me cry in the middle of the night, and even my favorite food has become somewhat tasteless and my looks have never looked plainer to me.

            I don’t know if you’re in the same situation as me, but in my case there isn’t much to be done, I suppose. The only way for me is “to pull the Madonna” and to reinvent myself.  From now on, I will buy different types of clothes ( and hopefully they’ll look good on me), I will go to different restaurants  and taste different flavors of ice-cream, I will even try taking different paths in my love life, all so I  can feel alive again. So I can feel my blood running through my veins and reminding me that I am not a lifeless corpse sitting on a couch.

             I guess you’re never too old for reinvention. Maybe this sheer boredom that every so often comes unto us is a sign that we can never settle to being something definite. How sad would the world be, should we only have to be one type of person from cradle to tomb? I don’t want to be this person who gets a college degree, worse yet, a high school degree and keeps that same old drab job from his graduation day until the day he retires from the same position he/she got 40 years ago.

             I want to be someone new with every year that comes by, with every book that I read, and most of all, I want to be someone who will always be able to surprise both myself and the people around me during every day of my life.

=)

Unrequitted love in post-modernity

(through Facebook, on my Ipod)

It’s hard to see’im online

And not send’im any hi

To see’im  go offline

And not to send him bye

Oh my oh my

So, I feel like callin’im

But I know he won’t pick up the phone

So I feel like textin’im

But I know that he is not alone

Oh my, I cry

Danilo Neves

I'm back, baby

Fasten up your seats cuz I'm back to this blog and I'll be posting some nice stuff that I think you guys would have like to read about! 


Danilo Neves

Thanks to my English 7 and 6 students, I've been able to learn some new words! 

1) Do you know what  Bedraggled means? ..... .think about this word..... try to recall it from the depths of your memory..... you don't know this one, do you? ..... well neither did I up until I saw it in Wuthering Heights. It means : " to be similar to something that was DRAGGED on mud".
That clearly doesn't mean clean (e.g. : "the beggar's bedraggled clothes", and "scarecrows in battered hats or draggled skirts"") ... actually, it means dirty!!

2) Now, what about the word scoundrel? Is it an easier one? This one I knew prior to Wuthering Heights, but I don't think I ever called anybody a scoundrel. Why is that? Because scoundrel means nothing less than a REALLY evil-doer! I don't know anybody like that! Anyway, I  hope you enjoyed the "difficult" words of the week! 

Expression of the day: Extration meaning "family background"

 As I was reading about the Gullah people I came across a very nice expression and I'll be writing a bit about it! The expression of the day is  "extraction"  and it means "descent"; this is something I found so interesting that I had to share! As an example, let me use this one : " That actress is of french extraction" I know it sounds silly ( the example)  but I found it a nice piece of vocab and worthy-sharing with my students. See y'all!

New words coming!!!!

                       Dear readers, I’m not sure if you've realized  it, but I’ve got this secret (or maybe not so secret) passion for learning different words and expressions in English and this obsession has led me to the study of big words that are (usually) only found in literary texts. This Thursday I was in my English 6 class and a friend of mine, Patricia, knowing about my little interest in more complex vocabulary, advised me to write a blog listing all the difficult words I came across as a learner of EFL. Because not only would it be productive for me but also to many people, namely my friends ( lol), I acquiesced to her opinion and started thinking about writing a section in my blog on rarely-used words in English.
                       As a homage to my friend, the first word to be presented is “wherewithal”. Patricia showed us this word this week and its definition is as it follows: “the necessary means, especially financial means to do something  (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/wherewithal)”. Therefore, I believe that every and single person has the wherewithal to access this blog since it’s free (unless you don’t have any internet connection or computer at home) and easy to be found. Anyway, this is it for this week! I don’t know which word I should talk about next. Maybe it will be “conundrum” since Patricia loves this word and this week’s section is entirely dedicated to her… Anyway, I still have a whole week to think about which word to share. See you next week!

Dia das crianças: uma reflexão

Galera, como o dia das crianças é algo que se festeja no Brasil acho que este post será melhor se for escrito em Português mesmo. Como já dito, hoje é o dia das crianças e isso me fez pensar, o que eu devo falar nesse dia tão especial para todos nós? Pensei em escrever algo contra a pedofilia, que infelizmente é algo que tem se tornado mais e mais comum, ou sobre o show do Justin Bieber no globo, mas acabei decidindo falar sobre algo que é bem íntimo: o que eu desejo para essas crianças de hoje. Semana passada, ao conversar com uma amiga religiosa minha, descobri que minha amiga acha que se o mundo todo fosse religioso teríamos um mundo melhor por que todos viveriam debaixo da vontade de “Deus” e não haveria mais guerras e o planeta seria um lugar melhor para se viver. Durante essa semana, foi a vez de sair com dois amigos meus que são ateus e que comentaram que os seus sonhos são ver um mundo todo racional e sem crença alguma em um “ser superior”. De fato, eu não acredito em religião alguma, portanto concordei com meus amigos ateus, mas ao ponderar com mais cuidados sobre a situação resolvi que acho que estava equivocado. Um mundo só de cristãos, mulçumanos ou só de ateus, além de utópico, é algo impossível de se tornar realidade. O bom mesmo é a diversidade. Querer um mundo cheio de pessoas iguais a nós mesmos é algo cruel se formos parar para pensar nisso. Os nazistas procuravam uma raça, os Puritanos em Massachusetts queriam que todos seguissem a sua religião e acabaram queimando várias pessoas acusadas (em vão) de bruxaria, os Portugueses impuseram a sua língua aos índios , enfim, todos procuravam trazer uma certa uniformidade a suas comunidades. Então meu recado é tentar criar um mundo uno não é nada mais nada menos que uma agressão. Tentar converter alguém a qualquer custo é uma agressão, tentar criar uma sociedade de casamentos heterossexuais apenas é uma agressão, desmoralizar alguém por causa das suas crenças religiosas é outra agressão. Portanto, espero que as crianças de hoje aprendam o valor da diversidade e do respeito ao próximo. É esse o meu desejo.

Why so intolerant?

There are three things in the world that get on nerves so bad that I have to count to 1000 just to keep myself under my own grip. Those are: people trying to convert me using the argument: “my religion is the correct path to heavens”, people who are too lazy to study anything, and those who do not agree with gay marriage. I live in Brazil and as every nice citizen should feel, I felt extremely proud of my country when on May 05th the legal union for homosexual couples was allowed. What I heard from people, however, is that such a thing should have never been allowed, and such a thing was an “abomination” to “God”. Then, full with indignation, I decided to write a post on this controversial theme showing some of the reasons why every person who considers himself or herself a RATIONAL being should agree with gay marriage despite of his or her religious background. First, marriage itself is not religious but a social institution. Christianity has indeed preached for years that only men and women have the right to wed, but what most people forget is that there are many other groups out there that are not Christian and they want to have the same rights as anybody else! And for all those who think that marriage among homosexuals should not be allowed based on the “fact” that the bible condemns it , I’m sorry but I have some news for you: our country is not under a theocratic regimen, but under a democracy. And to all those religious simpletons who were raised in a church and think they know the bible just because they have read it once: people are not obligated to live under the rules of a book they don’t even believe in! I wonder how they would like if a Buddhist told them that Christian couples can’t get married just because Buddha said so! (No offences to the Buddhists, I just used them to represent any religion other than any bible-oriented ones) Another “argument” that aggravates me is when people say: “I don’t agree with gay marriage because I wouldn’t like to see two men kissing in a public place”, or, “I don’t support gay marriage because I’m afraid of what will become of our children”. To all those who feel offended when they see two men or two girls kissing when they only want to show AFFECTION, you should simply stop staring at them and let them be happy! Why is it that people have to meddle with other people’s business? If you feel so bad when you see a gay couple kissing, imagine how much worse they feel when they want to say “ I love you” to the person they love and they simply CAN’T or when they see other (straight ) couples are kissing and they can’t do the same! Now here comes the question: why can straight people show affection and gay people can’t if they both pay the same amount of taxes and they both contribute to the development of our society just as much? All in all, what I’m trying to get across is: let other people be happy and do never try to impose your religious view on other people because I’m sure that you wouldn’t like if they did the same to you! I am not much a religious person myself, but I do reckon that the bible, as any other religious book, has many nice messages that are indeed worthy learning and following and one that I think is interesting is this one that is on Matthew 7: 12, it goes like this: “ (..) In everything, therefore, treat people the same way you want them to treat you, for this is the Law and the Prophets”. For those who might have problems understanding what is written here, I guess that this message applies in our context in the sense that we should not try to take away other people’s right to be and live their lives whichever way they want because we would not enjoy if they did the same to us.